\n\n Supplier Selection<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Open to all qualified<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Pre-selected list<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Based on the proposal evaluation<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Two-stage qualification<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Pre-selected list<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Pre-determined single supplier<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Competition Level<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n High<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate\/low<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Low<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n None<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Transparency<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n High<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Low<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n None<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Cost Efficiency<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Potentially most cost-effective<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Can be cost-effective<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Potentially cost-effective<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Not typically<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Complexity of Goods\/Services<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Standardised<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Complex\/customised<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Highly specialised<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Standardised<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Well-defined<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Proprietary\/unique<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Complexity of Process<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Simpler process<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate complexity<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n More complex<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate complexity<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Simpler process<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n No bidding process<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Evaluation Criteria<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Primarily price<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Price & qualifications<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Expertise, solution & price<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Qualifications, then price<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Primarily price<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Negotiation-based<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Timeframe<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Long<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Long<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Moderate<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Faster than RFP<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Fastest<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Suitability<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Simple projects,\u00a0 standardised goods<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Complex projects, customised goods<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Unique or specialised projects\/services<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Complex projects with qualification needs (shortlist)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Well-defined needs (goods\/services)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n No alternatives, unique or proprietary items<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n Remarks<\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Offers the most competition but can be time-consuming due to the large number of bids<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Provides a balance between competition and expertise selection<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Ideal for complex projects where expertise is crucial<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Good for open competition with an added layer of qualification screening<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Efficient for obtaining quick price quotes on well-defined needs from a few suppliers<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Limited use cases and requires strong justification due to lack of competition<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n[ Figure 2: Procurement Methods Comparison Table]<\/p>\n The procurement methods represent different approaches to acquiring goods and services:<\/p>\n \n- \n
Distinct characteristics:<\/strong> Each method has a unique process, level of competition and focus area (price vs expertise).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Independent application: <\/strong>Each method can be used independently based on project needs. For instance, a project might utilise an Open Tender for standard materials and an RFP for a specialised service.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nThere are, however, some similarities between certain methods:<\/p>\n \n- \n
Open Tendering and Restricted Tendering:<\/strong> These methods are similar in structure (bidding process) but differ in the pool of invited suppliers, and hence, level of competition. Open tendering is open to all qualified suppliers, while restricted tendering invites only pre-selected suppliers.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Two-Stage Tendering: <\/strong>This method combines the elements of Open Tendering and Restricted Tendering. In the first stage, similar to Restricted Tendering, prospective suppliers are pre-qualified based on their capabilities. Then, only shortlisted candidates participate in a competitive tendering process (like Open Tendering) for the final selection. This ensures receiving bids from qualified suppliers while maintaining a competitive element.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Request for Proposal (RFP) and Request for Quotation (RFQ): <\/strong>Both involve soliciting information from suppliers, but RFPs go beyond price to evaluate supplier capabilities, while RFQs are simpler, primarily focusing on quotes for well-defined goods or services.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Single Source Procurement: <\/strong>This method stands alone as it bypasses competition entirely, relying on a single pre-selected supplier.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nChoosing the most suitable procurement method depends on several factors:<\/p>\n \n- \n
Project complexity and requirements<\/p>\n<\/li>\n - \n
Budget and timeline constraints<\/p>\n<\/li>\n - \n
Level of competition and desired supplier expertise<\/p>\n<\/li>\n - \n
Risk tolerance and project criticality<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n By carefully considering these factors, procurement teams can select the method that offers the best balance of cost efficiency, timeliness and quality<\/a> for their specific project needs.<\/p>\nProcurement Process<\/h2>\nA well-established procurement process ensures that the goods and services needed by a company to operate are obtained at the right price, quality and time to meet project needs. Here is a breakdown of the stages of a rather typical procurement process:<\/p>\n \n- \n
Needs Identification: <\/strong>This stage initiates the process by identifying the specific goods or services required for a project. This involves understanding project requirements, specifications and quantities.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Requisition & Approval: <\/strong>A formal purchase request is created, detailing the required goods or services, estimated cost and justification for purchase. This requisition is submitted for approval by authorised personnel.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Supplier Sourcing & Selection:<\/strong> Once needs are identified and procurement requisition is approved, the process of assessing potential suppliers is commenced. The prospective suppliers are researched, evaluated and qualified based on factors like quality, price, reliability and past performance.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Tendering Process & Quotation Evaluation: <\/strong>Proposals are requested for comparison and evaluation using the suitable procurement method. Multiple suppliers submit quotes outlining their proposed technical specifications, price, terms and delivery schedule. The quotes are then evaluated to identify the most advantageous option.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Negotiation & Contract Formation:<\/strong> After evaluation, negotiations with the chosen supplier(s) take place to finalise pricing, terms and delivery conditions. A formal contract is then established by the procurement department with the involvement of applicable stakeholders, like Legal Counsel, Accounts Payable as well as Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) and others as needed, outlining the agreed-upon terms.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Order Placement & Order Management: <\/strong>Once the contract is signed, a purchase order is issued to the supplier, formally placing the order. Order management involves monitoring order status and ensuring delivery according to the contract.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Goods\/Services Receipt & Inspection: <\/strong>Upon delivery, the received goods or services are inspected to ensure they meet the contract specifications and quality standards.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Invoice Processing & Payment: <\/strong>Once goods or services are received, inspected and approved, the supplier’s invoice is reviewed by accounts payable for accuracy and processed for payment according to the agreed-upon terms. However, some agreements may require pre-payment, partial payment upfront, or other tailored payment conditions depending on the specifics of the transaction.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
| | | | | | | | | |