{"id":3825,"date":"2019-07-18T12:24:12","date_gmt":"2019-07-18T09:24:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fractory.com\/?p=3825"},"modified":"2024-08-15T14:56:35","modified_gmt":"2024-08-15T11:56:35","slug":"cost-reduction-manufacturing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fractory.com\/cost-reduction-manufacturing\/","title":{"rendered":"Cost Reduction in Manufacturing – How to Save \u00a310,000 per Engineer?"},"content":{"rendered":"
What if I told you that you can save at least \u00a310,000 per engineer annually<\/strong>? We’ll show you the maths behind it in this article.<\/p>\n Manufacturing cost reduction is usually aimed at saving money through cheaper production. That’s the most obvious way – comparing different offers and choosing the lowest price.<\/p>\n The variety of possibilities is much wider. Well-known ideas<\/a> for cost reduction in manufacturing are:<\/p>\n We are taking a closer look at the last point. It is often overlooked because many of those activities are viewed as a part of the natural manufacturing process. But we have some new viewpoints to share with you!<\/p>\n So let’s get to my audacious claim first. \u00a310,000 is a lot of money. What can you do to save this amount annually per engineer<\/strong>?<\/p>\n An engineer’s weekly workflow includes many steps. To simplify, an average project may take a week to accomplish from idea generation to making drawings. The last part – producing manufacturing drawings – takes about 20% of the allocated time. And this estimation includes a buffer.<\/p>\n Now, what would happen if you just didn’t have to make those drawings? You’d save 8 hours per week<\/strong>, which totals about 400 hours per year. In monetary terms, this equals the aforementioned \u00a310,000<\/strong> per year. And how to omit this crucial part of the engineering practice?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Fractory’s cloud manufacturing platform<\/a> accepts STEP files as well as file types native to SolidWorks (SLDPRT) and Autodesk Inventor (IPT). Nowadays, all projects are first done as 3D models that can easily be converted into the universal STEP format. Uploading those to our platform gives an instant price quote<\/a>. Therefore, there’s no more need for drawings.<\/p>\n And there’s no more need to spend 20% of an engineer’s time on that. How many engineers do you have at your company?<\/strong><\/p>\n Good engineers follow these engineering tips<\/a> to never rely on one solution only. Picking the best one comes down to functionality, reliability, aesthetics and price. The price point, so far, has been a rough estimation based on the engineer’s experience.<\/p>\n With automated quoting it’s easy to perform quick design to cost<\/a> analysis, you can simply upload a few competing ideas and compare the prices<\/strong>. You’d be surprised by the results. A gut feeling often doesn’t come close to reality.<\/p>\n Discovering that a higher-value solution has a similar or even lower price<\/strong> compared to a lesser option demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating cost and value engineering principles<\/a>.\u00a0A simple example is a part optimised for weight, where numerous cutouts make it seemingly much costlier. It can often be so that those cutouts, in reality, add very little to the final price.<\/p>\n\n
Saving Design Engineers’ Time<\/h2>\n
Comparing Different Designs<\/h3>\n
Cost Reduction Through Purchasing Manager<\/h2>\n
Saving Time on Quoting<\/h3>\n