{"id":24068,"date":"2024-10-10T14:47:43","date_gmt":"2024-10-10T11:47:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fractory.com\/?p=24068"},"modified":"2024-10-10T15:45:52","modified_gmt":"2024-10-10T12:45:52","slug":"risk-assessment-matrix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fractory.com\/risk-assessment-matrix\/","title":{"rendered":"Risk Assessment Matrix – What Is It & How It Works"},"content":{"rendered":"
Imagine a project running smoothly, then suddenly running into a roadblock. Missed deadlines due to unforeseen delays, or budget overruns caused by rising transportation costs<\/a>. These are just a few examples of risks that can disrupt even the best-laid plans.<\/p>\n Businesses and projects of all sizes face various risks, and being prepared for them is crucial to meeting the initially set target cost<\/a> and, ultimately, for business success. The risk assessment matrix is a powerful tool that helps to navigate these uncertainties.<\/p>\n A Risk Assessment Matrix, also known as a Risk Matrix or Risk Control Matrix, is a visual tool widely used in project management and various other fields. It acts as a grid-like chart to assess potential project risks based on two key criteria:<\/p>\n Risk probability (likelihood):<\/strong> How likely is the risk to happen? (very likely, likely, possible, unlikely, very unlikely)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Risk impact (severity):<\/strong> How bad could the consequences be? (very high, high, moderate, low, very low)<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Plotting each identified risk on the matrix, based on its probability and impact, provides a clear view of potential threats. This allows to understand the different types of risks, focus on the ones that demand the most attention during project planning, determine relevant actions for each identified risk to mitigate or eliminate its impact, as well as visualise the relative importance of different risks, facilitating informed decision-making.<\/p>\n While the traditional risk matrix focuses on likelihood and impact, there are different types of risk assessments that can be used alongside the matrix or independently. The best type of matrix for a project depends on its complexity, the level of detail required and the resources available.<\/p>\n Qualitative Risk Assessment:<\/strong> This is the most common type used with risk assessment matrices.\u00a0It focuses on\u00a0qualitative descriptions<\/strong>\u00a0of likelihood and impact,\u00a0such as “high,” “medium,” or “low.” It is a good starting point for understanding potential risks and prioritising them based on severity.<\/p>\n Examples of use:<\/strong>\u00a0Software development projects with a focus on identifying major functional or integration risks, initial risk assessment for a construction project.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Quantitative Risk Assessment:<\/strong> This type uses\u00a0numerical values<\/strong>\u00a0to assess both likelihood and impact.\u00a0It involves data analysis,\u00a0historical data,\u00a0or even statistical models to assign more precise probabilities and impact scores.\u00a0This approach is more detailed but requires more data and expertise.<\/p>\n Examples of use:<\/strong> Large-scale infrastructure projects (bridges, tunnels), financial investments with potential market volatility, projects with strict safety regulations (e.g., chemical plants).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Generic Risk Assessment:<\/strong> This type focuses on identifying and assessing\u00a0common risks<\/strong>\u00a0that might be encountered across different projects or industries.\u00a0It is a good starting point to get a general overview of potential issues but may not capture project-specific risks.<\/p>\n Examples of use:<\/strong>\u00a0Risk assessment for IT infrastructure upgrades in a company, initial risk identification for product development projects within a specific industry (e.g., medical devices).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Site-Specific Risk Assessment:<\/strong> This type focuses on identifying and assessing risks specific to a particular\u00a0location, environment, or situation<\/strong>.\u00a0It considers factors unique to that location and its potential impact on the project or business.<\/p>\n Examples of use:<\/strong> Building a wind farm in a high-wind zone, a construction project in a region with frequent earthquakes, restoration project on a historical building.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Dynamic Risk Assessment:<\/strong> This type recognises that risks are not static.\u00a0It is an\u00a0ongoing process<\/strong> that monitors and updates the risk assessment as the project progresses and supplier relationships<\/a> or business circumstances change. New risks might emerge, and the likelihood or impact of existing risks might evolve.<\/p>\n Examples of use:<\/strong>\u00a0Research and development projects with unknown outcomes, construction projects with phased deliveries and potential design changes, large-scale software development projects with ongoing feature updates.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n Relationship to Risk Matrix: <\/strong>The risk matrix can be used with any of these types of assessments. Qualitative assessments are commonly used with the matrix due to their simplicity. Quantitative scores, if available, can also be incorporated into the matrix for a more precise evaluation. The matrix itself does not dictate the type of assessment but rather serves as a visual tool to present the results<\/strong> regardless of the method used to evaluate risks.<\/p>\n Risk matrices typically use a square grid with scales for probability and impact. Common matrix sizes include:<\/p>\n 3×3 Matrix (simple and efficient):<\/strong> This is the most basic and widely used format. It is a good choice for projects with a manageable number of risks or for projects where a quick and clear overview of major risk categories is needed.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n 4×4 Matrix (balancing detail and simplicity)<\/strong>:\u00a0Compared to a 3×3 matrix, this grid provides a more detailed view of risks by offering additional categories for both likelihood and impact. This allows for capturing a wider range of risks and their severity levels, making it well-suited for projects of moderate complexity.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n 5×5 Matrix (highly detailed and precise)<\/strong>:\u00a0This grid provides the most detailed risk assessment. It is best suited for complex projects with many potential risks and a need for precise risk assessment.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Key Differences: <\/strong>Risk matrices differ in various ways. Here’s the breakdown:<\/p>\n Choosing the right grid: <\/strong>The choice of grid size depends on various factors including the project’s complexity and the desired level of detail in evaluating risks. Here are the key factors to consider:<\/p>\n How Does a Risk Assessment Matrix Work?<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Risk matrix can be prepared as per the following main steps:<\/p>\n Pick your tools:<\/strong>\u00a0Choose how to create your matrix (spreadsheet, project management software, pre-made matrix template).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Brainstorm risks:<\/strong>\u00a0Identify all potential project roadblocks, internal and external.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Select risk approach:<\/strong> Pick a method (qualitative, quantitative, etc.) that fits your project’s complexity and resources. This also includes choosing the grid size (3×3, 4×4, or 5×5) for your matrix.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Rate risk impact & probability:<\/strong>\u00a0Estimate how likely each risk is to occur (probability) and how badly it could impact your project (impact).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Plot & prioritise:<\/strong>\u00a0Place each risk on the matrix based on its likelihood and impact. Focus on addressing high-probability, high-impact risks first.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n There are two common methods used to calculate risk in a risk matrix:<\/p>\n Qualitative approach (simple ranking): <\/strong>This approach is favoured for its ease and speed. It uses descriptive terms like “high,” “medium,” or “low” for both likelihood and impact. The risk rating is then determined by combining these categories.<\/p>\n Example: <\/strong>A risk with a “high” likelihood and “medium” impact might be ranked as “high-medium” or simply “high,” indicating a significant concern requiring attention.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Quantitative approach: <\/strong>This method offers more precision by assigning numerical values to both likelihood and impact. These values are then multiplied to generate a risk score.<\/p>\n Example: <\/strong>Likelihood: “high” (assigned a value of 4), Impact: “severe” (assigned a value of 5). The risk score would be 4 x 5 = 20. This allows for an objective ranking of risks, with higher scores indicating greater threats.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n Once you have a populated risk matrix, you can use it to proactively manage project risks. Here are some key steps:<\/p>\n Prioritise:<\/strong>\u00a0Focus on high-risk areas (red zones) in the matrix. These require immediate attention. Develop plans for moderate risks and document even low ones.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Develop strategies:<\/strong>\u00a0Create plans to manage risks. This could involve:<\/p>\n Avoidance:<\/strong>\u00a0Eliminate the risk entirely (e.g., find multiple material suppliers).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Mitigation:<\/strong> Reduce the risk’s impact (e.g., implement stricter quality control<\/a> procedures).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Transference:<\/strong>\u00a0Shift the risk to someone else (e.g., purchase insurance to cover delays caused by labour strikes).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Acceptance:<\/strong>\u00a0Live with the risk if the consequences are manageable (e.g., schedule buffer for bad weather).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n Make a plan:<\/strong> Create a detailed risk management plan outlining actions, responsible parties, resources, and timelines for addressing each risk.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Communicate:<\/strong>\u00a0Share the matrix with stakeholders for informed decision-making.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Update regularly:<\/strong> Review the matrix as your project progresses. New information may require updates to the matrix and the risk management plans.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n By following these steps, your risk matrix becomes a dynamic tool for proactive risk management<\/a> throughout your project life cycle. It’s particularly effective when integrated into broader procurement transformation<\/a>, allowing for a more structured approach.<\/p>\n \n
What Is a Risk Assessment Matrix?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
What Are the Types of Risk Assessment Matrix?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
What Are the Common Risk Rating Scales?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
\n\n
\n \nGrid Size<\/td>\n No. of Risk Levels<\/td>\n Likelihood Categories<\/td>\n Impact Categories<\/td>\n Advantages<\/td>\n Disadvantages<\/td>\n Example
\n(Likelihood & Impact)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n 3×3<\/strong><\/td>\n 9<\/td>\n Low
\nMedium
\nHigh<\/td>\nMinor
\nModerate
\nSevere<\/td>\nSimple, easy to understand and use. Good for quick risk identification and prioritisation.<\/td>\n Less detail in risk categorisation. May not capture the nuances of complex risks.<\/td>\n Design flaw
\n(low, moderate)
\nSchedule delay
\n(medium, minor)
\nMaterial shortage
\n(low, severe)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n 4×4<\/strong><\/td>\n 16<\/td>\n Very low
\nLow
\nMedium
\nHigh<\/td>\nInsignificant
\nMinor
\nModerate
\nSevere<\/td>\nOffers more granularity for risk categorisation compared to 3×3. Provides a clearer distinction between different risk levels.<\/td>\n More complex than 3×3, requiring slightly more time for assessment.<\/td>\n Cost overrun
\n(low, moderate)
\nCommunication gap
\n(medium, moderate)
\nSafety hazard
\n(medium, severe)
\nLabour shortage
\n(high, severe)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n 5×5<\/strong><\/td>\n 25<\/td>\n Very low
\nLow
\nMedium
\nHigh
\nVery high<\/td>\nInsignificant
\nMinor
\nModerate
\nMajor
\nSevere<\/td>\nProvides the most detailed risk categorisation, allowing for precise assessment of risk severity. Useful for complex projects with diverse risks.<\/td>\n Most complex to use and requires the most time for assessment. May be overkill for simpler projects.<\/td>\n Unforeseen regulation change
\n(very low, insignificant)
\nScope creep
\n(medium, moderate)
\nEnvironmental impact
\n(medium, major)
\nSoftware integration issues
\n(high, major)
\nSupplier performance issues
\n(very high, severe)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n\n
\n \n#<\/td>\n Criteria<\/td>\n Impact on Grid Size Selection<\/td>\n Grid Size<\/td>\n Explanation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n \n 1.<\/td>\n Project complexity<\/strong><\/td>\n – High complexity
\n– Moderate complexity
\n– Low complexity<\/td>\n5×5
\n4×4
\n3×3<\/td>\nMore complex projects have a wider range of potential risks and require a more granular assessment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 2.<\/td>\n Available data & resources<\/strong><\/td>\n – Limited data\/resources
\n– Abundant data\/resources<\/td>\n3×3
\n4×4 or 5×5<\/td>\nLess data necessitates a simpler matrix. Extensive data allows for a more detailed assessment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 3.<\/td>\n Risk tolerance<\/strong><\/td>\n – Low tolerance
\n– High tolerance<\/td>\n4×4 or 5×5
\n3×3\u00a0<\/td>\nLower risk tolerance demands a more precise risk evaluation.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 4.<\/td>\n Project stage<\/strong><\/td>\n – Early stage
\n– Later stage (more data)<\/td>\n3×3
\n4×4 or 5×5<\/td>\nEarly stages may have limited information, favouring a simpler matrix. Later stages can benefit from more detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 5.<\/td>\n Industry standards<\/strong><\/td>\n Specific requirements may dictate grid size<\/td>\n \u00a0<\/td>\n Certain industries might have regulations mandating a specific level of risk assessment detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 6.<\/td>\n Team expertise<\/strong><\/td>\n – Less experience
\n– More experience<\/td>\n3×3
\n4×4 or 5×5<\/td>\nA less experienced team might benefit from a simpler matrix for easier understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 7.<\/td>\n Communication needs<\/strong><\/td>\n – High need for clarity
\n– Complex communication<\/td>\n3×3 or 4×4
\n5×5<\/td>\nIf clear communication is paramount, a simpler matrix might be better. Complex risks might require a more detailed matrix.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 8.<\/td>\n Project timeline<\/strong><\/td>\n – Limited time
\n– More time available<\/td>\n3×3
\n4×4 or 5×5<\/td>\nTime constraints favour a simpler matrix for quicker assessment.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n 9.<\/td>\n Project requirements<\/strong><\/td>\n Specific needs may dictate grid size<\/td>\n \u00a0<\/td>\n Project requirements might specify a particular level of risk assessment detail.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n 1. Making a Risk Assessment Matrix<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
2. Calculating Risk in the Matrix<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
3. Using the Matrix<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n